[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071107212005.f039c279.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:20:05 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>
Cc: lkml@...idb.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, drepper@...hat.com,
mtk-manpages@....net
Subject: Re: compat_sys_times() bogus until jiffies >= 0.
> On Thu, 8 Nov 2007 15:59:12 +1100 Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org> wrote:
> Andrew Morton writes:
>
> > "the latter" is what my protopatch does isn't it? It wraps at 0x7fffffff.
> > It appears that glibc treats all of 0x80000000-0xffffffff as an error.
>
> Not on powerpc. On powerpc the error indication is carried separately
> in a condition register bit. So a force_successful_syscall_return()
> call will make glibc automatically do the right thing without any
> glibc changes on powerpc.
OK
> Wrapping at 0x7fffffff will cause programs to see large negative
> deltas between successive calls when the wrap occurs. I can see that
> giving userspace fits. :)
>
Yup. But userspace will already have a fit if either the start or end time
advanced into the glibc-thought-that-was-an-error range.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists