linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Check length at deprecated_sysctl

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Nov 2007 17:19:08 +0900
From:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Check length at deprecated_sysctl_warning.

Hello.

Thanks for reformatting my patch
and sorry for surprising you with directory name
(I meant to type linux-2.6.24-rc2, not linux-2.6.22-rc2).

According to linux-2.6.23,
it seems that I should return -ENOTDIR
for invalid args->nlen value.

I got a question here regarding interpretation of CTL_MAXNAME .
Is args->nlen == CTL_MAXNAME valid?
It is treated as invalid while the definition says

  /* how many path components do we allow in a
     call to sysctl?   In other words, what is
     the largest acceptable value for the nlen
     member of a struct __sysctl_args to have? */

If "name[CTL_MAXNAME];" is what the author intended,
I think args->nlen == CTL_MAXNAME is valid.

Regards.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/