lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1194899975.9979.7.camel@w-amax.beaverton.ibm.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 12:39:35 -0800
From:	Max Asbock <masbock@...ibm.com>
To:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com
Subject: x86 32-bit machine check handler

Now that the 32-bit and 64-bit x86 machine check handlers live next to
each other a certain asymmetry in functionality is apparent. Notably,
the 64-bit machine check handler implements a timer that periodically
polls for silent machine check errors and makes them accessible to user
space through /dev/mcelog. Are there reasons the x86 32-bit machine
check handler couldn't do the same?

thanks,
Max  


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ