linux-kernel - Re: x86 32-bit machine check handler

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4738C3AE.1070104@zytor.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 13:20:46 -0800
From:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To:	Max Asbock <masbock@...ibm.com>
CC:	lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, tglx@...utronix.de,
	mingo@...hat.com
Subject: Re: x86 32-bit machine check handler

Max Asbock wrote:
> Now that the 32-bit and 64-bit x86 machine check handlers live next to
> each other a certain asymmetry in functionality is apparent. Notably,
> the 64-bit machine check handler implements a timer that periodically
> polls for silent machine check errors and makes them accessible to user
> space through /dev/mcelog. Are there reasons the x86 32-bit machine
> check handler couldn't do the same?

No, and in fact, it should.

	-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/