linux-kernel - Re: XFS related Oops

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071112222720.GG995458@sgi.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 09:27:20 +1100
From:	David Chinner <dgc@....com>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: XFS related Oops

On Mon, Nov 12, 2007 at 07:47:06AM +0100, Tino Keitel wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> after resume from suspend with 2.6.23.1, I got the following Oops:
> 
> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 3e0d204c
>  printing eip:
> c022807f
> *pde = 00000000
> Oops: 0000 [#1]
> SMP 
> Modules linked in: dvb_usb_cinergyT2 i915 drm cpufreq_stats usblp
> firewire_ohci firewire_core dvb_usb crc_itu_t evdev snd_hda_intel
> rtc_cmos sky2 dvb_core applesmc led_class coretemp hwmon
> CPU:    0
> EIP:    0060:[<c022807f>]    Not tainted VLI
> EFLAGS: 00010202   (2.6.23.1 #4)
> EIP is at xfs_iget_core+0x6f/0x690
> eax: 0033f000   ebx: 3e0d2010   ecx: f7826000   edx: 0033f000
> esi: 001346d7   edi: 00000000   ebp: f7525214   esp: f68b7cb4
> ds: 007b   es: 007b   fs: 00d8  gs: 0033  ss: 0068
> Process squid (pid: 2967, ti=f68b6000 task=f6833030 task.ti=f68b6000)
> Stack: c024f1b1 00000001 f6a3d6c0 001346d7 f789ce00 c18993d8 c04fb280
> f7525218 
>        00000000 00000000 f7826000 e652c240 00000000 3e0d2010 e652c25c
> e652c240 
>        001346d7 f7826000 c0228774 001346d7 00000000 00000000 00000000
> f68b7d80 
> Call Trace:
>  [<c024f1b1>] kmem_zone_alloc+0x51/0xb0
>  [<c0228774>] xfs_iget+0xd4/0x160
>  [<c024474b>] xfs_dir_lookup_int+0x9b/0x100
>  [<c0247ec5>] xfs_lookup+0x75/0xa0
>  [<c0256874>] xfs_vn_lookup+0x54/0x90
>  [<c0177a32>] do_lookup+0x122/0x1a0
>  [<c01794d4>] __link_path_walk+0x784/0xd80
>  [<c0273072>] __next_cpu+0x12/0x30
>  [<c0121dbd>] find_busiest_group+0x19d/0x6a0
>  [<c0179b15>] link_path_walk+0x45/0xc0
>  [<c0131350>] process_timeout+0x0/0x10
>  [<c016eb62>] get_unused_fd_flags+0x52/0xc0
>  [<c0179db3>] do_path_lookup+0x73/0x1b0
>  [<c01719b8>] get_empty_filp+0x58/0x120
>  [<c017a9d1>] __path_lookup_intent_open+0x51/0xa0
>  [<c017aab0>] path_lookup_open+0x20/0x30
>  [<c017abb6>] open_namei+0x66/0x640
>  [<c0131697>] lock_timer_base+0x27/0x60
>  [<c0131715>] try_to_del_timer_sync+0x45/0x50
>  [<c016ee7e>] do_filp_open+0x2e/0x60
>  [<c0131350>] process_timeout+0x0/0x10
>  [<c016eb62>] get_unused_fd_flags+0x52/0xc0
>  [<c016eefc>] do_sys_open+0x4c/0xe0
>  [<c016efcc>] sys_open+0x1c/0x20
>  [<c010428e>] sysenter_past_esp+0x5f/0x85
>  =======================
> Code: 44 24 1c 8b 44 24 1c e8 60 92 1b 00 8b 5d 00 85 db 89 5c 24 34 75
> 14 e9 90 00 00 00 8b 5b 04 85 db 89 5c 24 34 0f 84 81 00 00 00 <8b> 53
> 3c 8b 43 38 31 fa 31 f0 09 c2 75 e3 8d 83 dc 00 00 00 e8 
> EIP: [<c022807f>] xfs_iget_core+0x6f/0x690 SS:ESP 0068:f68b7cb4
> 
> Does this ring any bells?

No. I'd say something got screwed up during suspend/resume. Is it
reproducable?

Cheers,

Dave.
-- 
Dave Chinner
Principal Engineer
SGI Australian Software Group
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/