[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1194952142.18185.104.camel@pasglop>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:09:02 +1100
From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tony@...eyournoodle.com,
paulus@...ba.org, dino@...ibm.com, tytso@...ibm.com,
dvhltc@...ibm.com, niv@...ibm.com, antonb@...ibm.com,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Subject: Re: [PATCH, RFC] improved hacks to allow -rt to run kernbench on
POWER
On Tue, 2007-11-13 at 11:05 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Looking at the code:
>
> /* radix tree not lockless safe ! we use a brlock-type mecanism
> * for now, until we can use a lockless radix tree
> */
> static void irq_radix_wrlock(unsigned long *flags)
>
> The RCU radix tree stuffs have gone upstream long ago.
>
> Anyway, it seems its the generic irq stuff that uses raw_spinlock_t
> and
> disables IRQs, so there isn't much we can do from the ARCH level I'm
> afraid :-(
>
> Ingo, any sane ideas?
As discussed on IRC< there are a couple of other related issues, though
part of them go away if I can get rid of the brlock I have in there
thanks to the new RCU based radix tree.
I'll give that some thoughts and come back to you tomorrow or thursday
hopefully with a patch.
Cheers,
Ben.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists