lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 10:59:24 -0800 From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> To: Philip Mucci <mucci@...utk.edu> Cc: eranian@....hp.com, William Cohen <wcohen@...hat.com>, akpm@...l.org, Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Perfmon <perfmon@...ali.hpl.hp.com>, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, perfmon2-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, OSPAT devel <ospat-devel@...utk.edu>, papi list <ptools-perfapi@...utk.edu> Subject: Re: [perfmon] Re: [perfmon2] perfmon2 merge news On Tue, Nov 13, 2007 at 10:47:45AM -0800, Philip Mucci wrote: > Hi folks, > > Well, I can say the mood here at supercomputing'07 is pretty somber in > regards to the latest exchange of messages regarding the perfmon patches. "somber"? Why? We (a number of the kernel developers) want to see the perfmon code make it into the kernel tree, unfortunatly, in the current state it is in, that's not going to happen. Andi specified a way that this can happen, just refactor your patches into smaller bits that can be reviewed and applied. If you, or anyone else has any questions about this, please let us know. So far, I have not seen any response to his message, so I'm guessing that the perfmon developers either are off working on this, or don't care. And if they don't care, then yes, I agree with your "somber" feeling... thanks, greg k-h - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists