[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071112191320.55e49462.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 19:13:20 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp>
Cc: ebiederm@...ssion.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] sysctl: Check length at deprecated_sysctl_warning.
On Tue, 13 Nov 2007 12:07:23 +0900 Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.sakura.ne.jp> wrote:
> Andrew, please replace previous patch with this one.
> This one returns -ENOTDIR.
> ----------
>
> Original patch forgot to check args->nlen.
> I don't know why args->nlen == CTL_MAXNAME is rejected,
> but it has been rejected traditionally.
>
> Signed-off-by: Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
> Cc: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> ---
>
> kernel/sysctl.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff -puN kernel/sysctl.c~sysctl-check-length-at-deprecated_sysctl_warning kernel/sysctl.c
> --- a/kernel/sysctl.c~sysctl-check-length-at-deprecated_sysctl_warning
> +++ a/kernel/sysctl.c
> @@ -2609,6 +2609,10 @@ static int deprecated_sysctl_warning(str
> int name[CTL_MAXNAME];
> int i;
>
> + /* Check args->nlen. */
> + if (args->nlen <= 0 || args->nlen >= CTL_MAXNAME)
I believe (args->nlen > CTL_MAXNAME) was correct.
> + return -ENOTDIR;
Ho hum. Why does that code return -ENOTDIR on error anyway?
> +
> /* Read in the sysctl name for better debug message logging */
> for (i = 0; i < args->nlen; i++)
> if (get_user(name[i], args->name + i))
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists