[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711132241.59074.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:41:58 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org, "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression with tbench
On Tuesday 13 November 2007 06:44, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > BTW. your size-2048 kmalloc cache is order-1 in the default setup,
> > wheras kmalloc(1024) or kmalloc(4096) will be order-0 allocations. And
> > SLAB also uses order-0 for size-2048. It would be nice if SLUB did the
> > same...
>
> You can try to see the effect that order 0 would have by booting with
>
> slub_max_order=0
Yeah, that didn't help much, but in general I think it would give
more consistent and reliable behaviour from slub.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists