linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <200711132244.17913.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date:	Tue, 13 Nov 2007 22:44:17 +1100
From:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers

On Tuesday 13 November 2007 07:13, Matt Mackall wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:36:56PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just ran some tbench numbers (from dbench-3.04), on a 2 socket, 8
> > core x86 system, with 1 NUMA node per socket. With kernel 2.6.24-rc2,
> > comparing slab vs slub allocators.
>
> Damn your misleading subject! I thought this was going to be about
> something interesting.

Actually I did test slob as well -- it's competitive with slab and
slub up to about 4 cores, which is nice.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/