linux-kernel - Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071112201322.GX17536@waste.org>
Date:	Mon, 12 Nov 2007 14:13:22 -0600
From:	Matt Mackall <mpm@...enic.com>
To:	Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2 slab vs slob tbench numbers

On Fri, Nov 09, 2007 at 11:36:56PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Just ran some tbench numbers (from dbench-3.04), on a 2 socket, 8
> core x86 system, with 1 NUMA node per socket. With kernel 2.6.24-rc2,
> comparing slab vs slub allocators.

Damn your misleading subject! I thought this was going to be about
something interesting.

-- 
Mathematics is the supreme nostalgia of our time.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/