[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711121144001.26936@schroedinger.engr.sgi.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Nov 2007 11:44:31 -0800 (PST)
From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@....com>
To: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
cc: linux-netdev@...r.kernel.org,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 2.6.24-rc2: Network commit causes SLUB performance regression
with tbench
On Sat, 10 Nov 2007, Nick Piggin wrote:
> BTW. your size-2048 kmalloc cache is order-1 in the default setup,
> wheras kmalloc(1024) or kmalloc(4096) will be order-0 allocations. And
> SLAB also uses order-0 for size-2048. It would be nice if SLUB did the
> same...
You can try to see the effect that order 0 would have by booting with
slub_max_order=0
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists