linux-kernel - Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <473B4132.5030402@goop.org>
Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2007 10:40:50 -0800
From:	Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
To:	Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
CC:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
	virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>,
	Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24

Greg KH wrote:
> These don't apply now due to the x86 merge.  Care to backport them and
> send them to the stable@...nel.org address so we can apply them
> properly?

I'm a bit confused.  The patches you mailed out are against arch/i386. 
Won't they apply to the stable tree as-is?

> Although, it's not like anyone actually uses the in-kernel Xen on
> 2.6.23, so it's probably not really worth it.
>   

To be fair, those fixes were in response to bug reports raised on the
released 2.6.23 kernel.  But it isn't screamingly urgent.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/