[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071114190335.GA10024@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 11:03:35 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...e.de>, Chris Wright <chrisw@...s-sol.org>,
virtualization@...ts.osdl.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Keir Fraser <keir@...source.com>,
Stable Kernel <stable@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [stable] [PATCH 00/12] xen/paravirt_ops patches for 2.6.24
On Wed, Nov 14, 2007 at 10:40:50AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> Greg KH wrote:
> > These don't apply now due to the x86 merge. Care to backport them and
> > send them to the stable@...nel.org address so we can apply them
> > properly?
>
> I'm a bit confused. The patches you mailed out are against arch/i386.
> Won't they apply to the stable tree as-is?
Was this second series a new set, or a different one? I was assuming
they were new patches, and that they too needed to be applied.
These patches were sent against the merged x86 tree, not the -stable
tree with i386.
> > Although, it's not like anyone actually uses the in-kernel Xen on
> > 2.6.23, so it's probably not really worth it.
> >
>
> To be fair, those fixes were in response to bug reports raised on the
> released 2.6.23 kernel. But it isn't screamingly urgent.
Ok, that's fine, but can you send some patches that I can apply? :)
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists