linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmap vs NFS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1195071564.22457.0.camel@lappy>
Date:	Wed, 14 Nov 2007 21:19:22 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	Nick Piggin <npiggin@...e.de>, Hugh Dickins <hugh@...itas.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] mmap vs NFS


Seems I forgot to mention this is an RFC :-)

On Wed, 2007-11-14 at 21:01 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> Currently there is an AB-BA deadlock in NFS mmap.
> 
> nfs_file_mmap() can take i_mutex, while holding mmap_sem, whereas the regular
> locking order is the other way around.
> 
> This patch-set attempts to solve this issue.
> 

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/