linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 17/17] (Avoid overload)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <473EE2BE.BA47.005A.0@novell.com>
Date:	Sat, 17 Nov 2007 12:46:54 -0500
From:	"Gregory Haskins" <ghaskins@...ell.com>
To:	"Steven Rostedt" <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Christoph Lameter" <clameter@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 17/17] (Avoid overload)

>>> On Sat, Nov 17, 2007 at  1:33 AM, in message
<20071117063318.GA31442@...dmis.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
wrote: 
 
> -	if ((p->prio >= rq->rt.highest_prio)
> -	    && (p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1)) {
> +	if (unlikely(rt_task(rq->curr))) {
>  		int cpu = find_lowest_rq(p);
>  
>  		return (cpu == -1) ? task_cpu(p) : cpu;

We probably should leave the "p->nr_cpus_allowed > 1" in the conditional since it doesn't make sense to look if the task can't go anywhere.

-Greg

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/