[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071118010408.GE26865@elte.hu>
Date: Sun, 18 Nov 2007 02:04:08 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tglx@...x.de
Subject: Re: [patch] Printk kernel version in WARN_ON
* Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
> Should be done for all architectures, methinks.
>
> If so, an appropriate way to do that would be to do
> s/dump_stack/arch_dump_stack/ and do a single all-arch implementation
> of dump_stack(). (Where we might add new goodies in the future).
i agree we can clean this up - but this is a single-line thing that is
very useful for QA so i think utility warrants .24 inclusion. The oops
printouts are not generalized anyway.
> Problem is that this will add a new an pointless entry to all the
> stack dumps, unless the arch_dump_stack() implementation is smart
> enough to skip the innermost frame.
x86 can skip stackframes via stacktrace.c.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists