linux-kernel - Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc2-mm1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <64bb37e0711181044s75fd1081sdf44dac2e060d49a@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:44:19 +0100
From:	"Torsten Kaiser" <just.for.lkml@...glemail.com>
To:	"Peter Zijlstra" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Cc:	"Andrew Morton" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>,
	"Kamalesh Babulal" <kamalesh@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linuxppc-dev@...abs.org,
	nfs@...ts.sourceforge.net, "Andy Whitcroft" <apw@...dowen.org>,
	"Balbir Singh" <balbir@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	"Jan Blunck" <jblunck@...e.de>,
	"Trond Myklebust" <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>, steved@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] 2.6.24-rc2-mm1 - kernel bug on nfs v4

On Nov 18, 2007 12:05 AM, Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl> wrote:
> I've been staring at this NFS code for a while an can't make any sense
> out of it. It seems to correctly initialize the waitqueue. So this would
> indicate corruption of some sort.

No, it does not "correctly" initialize the waitqueue. It doesn't even
try to initialize it.

I now found the guilty patch and what is wrong with it.

nfs-stop-sillyname-renames-and-unmounts-from-racing.patch adds:

@@ -110,8 +112,22 @@ struct nfs_server {
                                                   filesystem */
 #endif
        void (*destroy)(struct nfs_server *);
+
+       atomic_t active; /* Keep trace of any activity to this server */
+       wait_queue_head_t active_wq;  /* Wait for any activity to stop  */

and tries to initialize it:
@@ -593,6 +593,10 @@ static int nfs_init_server(struct nfs_server *server,
        server->namelen  = data->namlen;
        /* Create a client RPC handle for the NFSv3 ACL management interface */
        nfs_init_server_aclclient(server);
+
+       init_waitqueue_head(&server->active_wq);
+       atomic_set(&server->active, 0);
+

and then uses it via nfs_sb_active and nfs_sb_deactive:

@@ -29,6 +29,7 @@ struct nfs_unlinkdata {
 static void
 nfs_free_unlinkdata(struct nfs_unlinkdata *data)
 {
+       nfs_sb_deactive(NFS_SERVER(data->dir));
        iput(data->dir);
        put_rpccred(data->cred);
        kfree(data->args.name.name);
@@ -151,6 +152,7 @@ static int nfs_do_call_unlink(struct dentry
*parent, struct inode *dir, struct n
                nfs_dec_sillycount(dir);
                return 0;
        }
+       nfs_sb_active(NFS_SERVER(dir));
        data->args.fh = NFS_FH(dir);
        nfs_fattr_init(&data->res.dir_attr);


But it does not notice this:
struct dentry_operations nfs_dentry_operations = {
        .d_revalidate   = nfs_lookup_revalidate,
        .d_delete       = nfs_dentry_delete,
        .d_iput         = nfs_dentry_iput,
};
struct dentry_operations nfs4_dentry_operations = {
        .d_revalidate   = nfs_open_revalidate,
        .d_delete       = nfs_dentry_delete,
        .d_iput         = nfs_dentry_iput,
};

NFSv2/3 and NFSv4 share the same dentry_iput and so share the same
unlink and sillyrename logic.
But they do not share nfs_init_server()!

I wonder why this doesn't blow up more violently, but only hangs...

But as I don't know if it is correct to add the workqueue
initialization to nfs4_init_server() or remove the nfs_sb_active /
nfs_sb_deactive for the NFSv4 case, I can't offer a patch to fix this.

Torsten
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/