linux-kernel - Re: NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ? SOLUTION ?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <474087F6.9030305@abinetworks.biz>
Date:	Sun, 18 Nov 2007 19:44:06 +0100
From:	Gianluca Alberici <gianluca@...networks.biz>
To:	unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
CC:	Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@....uio.no>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: NFS Bug in 2.6.23 ? SOLUTION ?

Trond,

The problem is in nfs_mountpoint_timeout. After this time 
dentry_delete(/,4) removes the mountpoint, then it is very difficult to 
automount (at least with CFSD), one has got to try 2 or three times 
cd'ing into the mount point. Applications wont ever had the chance to 
autoremount (ENOTDIR).

I have some questions:

- nfs_mountpoint_timeout seems to be set in sysctl.c even if nfsv4 is 
not. Is this correct ? I've read somewhere that it was introduced for v4.
- Why this sysctl is not registered in my 2.6.20 kernel where it should 
be registered ?
- Why this parameter has not a 'disabled' value (i mean kind of -1) ?

Thanks,

Gianluca
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/