[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071120125557.GB8355@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:55:57 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3,
v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
* Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr> wrote:
> > As usual, any sort of feedback, bugreport, fix and suggestion is
> > more than welcome!
>
> Testing sched-cfs-v2.6.24-rc3-v24.patch on top of 2.6.24-rc3-git1
> (ignored the two "already applied" messages coming from git1 commits),
> I get a 1.00 minimum load in top, coming from the load_balance_mo
> thread staying in D-state. I get this on 2 different computers with
> similar configs, so I am attaching one of them here.
does the patch below fix that problem for you?
Ingo
Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
===================================================================
--- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
+++ linux/kernel/sched.c
@@ -7138,7 +7138,7 @@ static int load_balance_monitor(void *un
else if (timeout < sysctl_sched_max_bal_int_shares)
timeout *= 2;
- msleep(timeout);
+ msleep_interruptible(timeout);
}
return 0;
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists