[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87zlx9vypg.fsf@free.fr>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 14:22:19 +0100
From: Damien Wyart <damien.wyart@...e.fr>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7
> > Testing sched-cfs-v2.6.24-rc3-v24.patch on top of 2.6.24-rc3-git1
> > (ignored the two "already applied" messages coming from git1
> > commits), I get a 1.00 minimum load in top, coming from the
> > load_balance_mo thread staying in D-state. I get this on 2 different
> > computers with similar configs, so I am attaching one of them here.
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> [071120 13:55]:
> does the patch below fix that problem for you?
Yes, it does. Thanks for your answer.
Damien
> Index: linux/kernel/sched.c
> ===================================================================
> --- linux.orig/kernel/sched.c
> +++ linux/kernel/sched.c
> @@ -7138,7 +7138,7 @@ static int load_balance_monitor(void *un
> else if (timeout < sysctl_sched_max_bal_int_shares)
> timeout *= 2;
>
> - msleep(timeout);
> + msleep_interruptible(timeout);
> }
>
> return 0;
>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists