linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mct232: speed, new termios and compliance cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20071120110413.5f84e092.zaitcev@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 11:04:13 -0800
From:	Pete Zaitcev <zaitcev@...hat.com>
To:	Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
	zaitcev@...hat.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mct232: speed, new termios and compliance cleanups

On Mon, 19 Nov 2007 15:22:11 +0000, Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk> wrote:

> Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@...hat.com>

This looks good, but have a couple of comments. Maybe I can fix it up.

>   * we do not know how to support. We ignore them for the moment.
>   * XXX Rate-limit the error message, it's user triggerable.

This XXX item is fixed by this patch, so should be removed.

> +		/* FIXME: Can we use any divider - should we do
> +		   divider = 115200/value;
> +		   real baud = 115200/divider */
>  		switch (value) {
>  		case 300: break;

I do not understand this FIXME comment. What is wrong with current
code? The result of the function is given to the device's sequencer.
Do you want to get rid of the switch? Please unconfuse me.

-- Pete
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/