[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071120212851.EEB5026F8BE@magilla.localdomain>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:28:51 -0800 (PST)
From: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...sign.ru>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] kill PT_PTRACED
> This is microoptimization, both ->signal and ->sighand are cleared at the same
> time in __exit_signal(), so we can check either. But we are using the value of
> ->sighand below, so it makes sense to read ->sighand, not ->signal.
Ok. Anality would suggest doing that in a separate patch, though I don't
really care.
> Andrew, it is very easy to send the new patch to fix the code, but is it
> possible to fix the changelog somehow for the patch in -mm tree?
I'd prefer a comment in the code there making it explicit that ->sighand is
a "reaped yet" synchronization check (under tasklist_lock).
Thanks,
Roland
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists