[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071120.134839.229691661.davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:48:39 -0800 (PST)
From: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
To: drepper@...hat.com
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets
From: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@...hat.com>
Date: Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:04:53 -0800
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> David Miller wrote:
> > Where does this INDIRECT_PARAM() macro get defined? I do not
> > see it being defined anywhere in these patches.
>
> Defined in <linux/indirect.h>:
>
> +#define INDIRECT_PARAM(set, name) current->indirect_params.set.name
>
> Not my idea, I was following one review comment.
This was not in the patches you posted, I double checked before
sending my reply.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists