linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <474357EC.4080107@oracle.com>
Date:	Tue, 20 Nov 2007 13:55:56 -0800
From:	Zach Brown <zach.brown@...cle.com>
To:	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
CC:	drepper@...hat.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mingo@...e.hu, tglx@...utronix.de,
	torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCHv4 5/6] Allow setting O_NONBLOCK flag for new sockets


>>> Where does this INDIRECT_PARAM() macro get defined?  I do not
>>> see it being defined anywhere in these patches.
>> Defined in <linux/indirect.h>:
>>
>> +#define INDIRECT_PARAM(set, name) current->indirect_params.set.name
>>
>> Not my idea, I was following one review comment.
> 
> This was not in the patches you posted, I double checked before
> sending my reply.

Not to belabor this point, but it was:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/20/53

$ grep -l INDIRECT_PARAM .git/patches/master/*
.git/patches/master/indirect-v4-4.patch
.git/patches/master/indirect-v4-5.patch
.git/patches/master/indirect-v4-6.patch

Maybe the patches got to you out of order so you saw 5/ before 4/?

- z

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/