linux-kernel - Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071121103951.GA5788@elte.hu>
Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2007 11:39:51 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3,
	v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7


* Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com> wrote:

> To answer your latest mail, again I don't have numbers but from my 
> point ov view:
> 
> 23.1 < 23.1+ck < 23.8+cfs.24
> 
> where 23.1+ck is slightly better than vanilla 23.1 and 23.8+cfs.24 is 
> much better than 23.1+ck.
> 
> My workload is pretty standard, F8+kde+firefox+kmail+amsn, some kernel 
> compile and so on.

do you remember which particular workload improved the most, and in 
roughly whatway? (no need for numbers - subjective impressions are 
accurate enough for this)

	Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/