linux-kernel - Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 21 Nov 2007 12:11:49 +0100
From:	"Fabio Comolli" <fabio.comolli@...il.com>
To:	"Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [patch/backport] CFS scheduler, -v24, for v2.6.24-rc3, v2.6.23.8, v2.6.22.13, v2.6.21.7

Hi

On Nov 21, 2007 11:39 AM, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu> wrote:
>
> * Fabio Comolli <fabio.comolli@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > To answer your latest mail, again I don't have numbers but from my
> > point ov view:
> >
> > 23.1 < 23.1+ck < 23.8+cfs.24
> >
> > where 23.1+ck is slightly better than vanilla 23.1 and 23.8+cfs.24 is
> > much better than 23.1+ck.
> >
> > My workload is pretty standard, F8+kde+firefox+kmail+amsn, some kernel
> > compile and so on.
>
> do you remember which particular workload improved the most, and in
> roughly whatway? (no need for numbers - subjective impressions are
> accurate enough for this)
>

Firefox, especially when multiple tabs are open. Sometimes I used to
experience some latencies that with cfs.24 are gone.

>         Ingo
>

Regards,
Fabio
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/