[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <d120d5000711260640y68c6136fy181b63af85bf6ae6@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:40:14 -0500
From: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: "Paul Mundt" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"Kristoffer Ericson" <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>,
Dmitry <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-main <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)
On Nov 25, 2007 11:30 PM, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:03:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
>
> > Why I want to use 600-series/700-series instead of 6XX/7XX is simply
> > because 600-series/700-series leaves no doubt.
> >
> Apparently your end users are more technically apt than I am, as I have
> no idea how using 00 over XX makes things any less ambiguous.
>
> We already have a 6xx mach-type that drivers can set their dependency on.
> If it's not 680-only, then that's a perfectly reasonable dependency. Feel
> free to change the Kconfig text to make the description more useful, but
> please don't start idly shuffling around code and symbols because users
> can't work out why a driver is available that they can't support.
Agreed. Users simply should not care what a particular module is
called. If Kconfig entries and/or its help is unclear on whta devices
are supported by the drivers let's fix that.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists