[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071126175339.5e8fa5b4.Kristoffer.ericson@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:53:39 +0100
From: Kristoffer Ericson <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>
To: "Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Cc: "Paul Mundt" <lethal@...ux-sh.org>,
"Kristoffer Ericson" <kristoffer.ericson@...il.com>,
"Russell King" <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
linux-main <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Question regarding naming scheme (HP Jornada 6XX/7XX)
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:40:14 -0500
"Dmitry Torokhov" <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com> wrote:
> On Nov 25, 2007 11:30 PM, Paul Mundt <lethal@...ux-sh.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 26, 2007 at 12:03:29AM +0100, Kristoffer Ericson wrote:
> >
> > > Why I want to use 600-series/700-series instead of 6XX/7XX is simply
> > > because 600-series/700-series leaves no doubt.
> > >
> > Apparently your end users are more technically apt than I am, as I have
> > no idea how using 00 over XX makes things any less ambiguous.
> >
> > We already have a 6xx mach-type that drivers can set their dependency on.
> > If it's not 680-only, then that's a perfectly reasonable dependency. Feel
> > free to change the Kconfig text to make the description more useful, but
> > please don't start idly shuffling around code and symbols because users
> > can't work out why a driver is available that they can't support.
>
> Agreed. Users simply should not care what a particular module is
> called. If Kconfig entries and/or its help is unclear on whta devices
> are supported by the drivers let's fix that.
>
Ok, guess the idea was shot down then :). I'll look at Kconfigs to see how I can make it clearer.
thx for feedback.
> --
> Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists