linux-kernel - Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dropped?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2c0942db0711260719t4468807bm85fcc8cc4ebd138@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 26 Nov 2007 07:19:52 -0800
From:	"Ray Lee" <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>
To:	"Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
Cc:	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dropped?

On Nov 26, 2007 7:12 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...shcourse.ca> wrote:
> On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>
> > On Mon, 26 Nov 2007, Ray Lee wrote:
> >
> > > On Nov 26, 2007 12:54 AM, Robert P. J. Day <rpjday@...shcourse.ca> wrote:
> > > >   on current systems, "rpm" no longer has build capability and will
> > > > fail thusly:
> > > >
> > > > rpm --target i386 -ta ../kernel-2.6.24rc3g2ffbb837dirty.tar.gz
> > > > --target: unknown option
> > > >
> > > >   so it would make more sense to just require "rpmbuild" on the
> > > > machine, would it not?
> > >
> > > Only on current machines. You'd break building kernel RPMs on older
> > > systems that don't have rpmbuild installed. So the change wouldn't
> > > fix anything, and would break some non-zero number of setups that
> > > are currently working, making the change a guaranteed net loss.
> > >
> > > A patch that added version checks against rpm and whinged
> > > appropriately about needing rpmbuild would likely be accepted,
> > > though.
> >
> > yes, i suspect that's the right answer.
> >
> > rday
>
> BTW, is there someone who knows what the relevant version is of "rpm"
> that stopped incorporating the packaging functionality?  i'm a bit
> swamped today but if someone wants to whip up a patch and get it in
> before the next major release, that would be useful, i would think.
>
> in short, can someone else handle this?  :-)

I'm afraid I'm all .deb here, so no go for me.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/