[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0711261716220.22369@fbirervta.pbzchgretzou.qr>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2007 17:17:18 +0100 (CET)
From: Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...putergmbh.de>
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@...shcourse.ca>
cc: Ray Lee <ray-lk@...rabbit.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: can support for "rpm"-based package building just be dropped?
On Nov 26 2007 11:13, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
>> >>>Only on current machines. You'd break building kernel RPMs on older
>> >>>systems that don't have rpmbuild installed.
>> >>
>> >> Those old machines probably do not even run a distro-fabricated
>> >> gcc that would compile a git head kernel.
>> >
>> >well, in a nutshell, the problem scenario is that it's entirely
>> >possible to have a modern distro (say, fedora 8, like i'm using) on
>> >which you have the latest "rpm" package installed, but not
>> >"rpmbuild".
>>
>> What, modern and no rpmbuild?
>
>i didn't say it *wouldn't* have rpmbuild, i said it *might not*. at
>the moment, on my f8 system, the only package that requires the
>rpm-build package is rpmdevtools, and it's entirely possible that
>there's no need for *that* package.
rpm -b does not work in opensuse anymore (redirects you to use rpmbuild), and I
bet fedora will do the same, so if you don't have rpm-build, tough luck for
make rpm.
>so all i'm suggesting is that the
>build procedure take into account the possibility that rpm-build is
>not installed.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists