[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20071127004445.a046f791.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 27 Nov 2007 00:44:45 -0800
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Wagner Ferenc <wferi@...f.hu>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: bonding sysfs output
On Mon, 26 Nov 2007 09:29:40 +0100 Wagner Ferenc <wferi@...f.hu> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
>
> > On Sun, 25 Nov 2007 16:12:57 +0100 Wagner Ferenc <wferi@...f.hu> wrote:
> >
> >> I propose it as a fix for trailing NULs and spaces like eg.
> >>
> >> $ od -c /sys/class/net/bond0/bonding/slaves
> >> 0000000 e t h - l e f t e t h - r i g
> >> 0000020 h t \n \0
> >> 0000025
> >>
> >> I'm afraid there're other problems with "++more++" handling, but let's
> >> not consider those just yet. Find the patch attached. The first
> >> hunks also renames buffer to buf, for consistency's shake.
> >>
> >> The original version had varying behaviour for Not Applicable cases.
> >> This patch also settles for empty files (not even a line feed) in
> >> those cases, but I'm not sure about the general policy on this matter.
> >
> > hm, there are a lot of changes there. Were they all actually needed to fix
> > the one bug which you have described?
>
> Trailing NULs are present in each file under /sys/class/net/*/bonding
> and also in /sys/class/net/bonding_masters. That is, in every file
> provided by drivers/net/bonding/bond_sysfs.c. Most of the patch is
> concerned with this.
>
> Closely related is the presence of trailing spaces in multivalue
> files. There are three such files, one of them has the trailing space
> removed. This patch removes it from the other two. During this it
> also renames one function argument 'buffer' to 'buf', for consistency.
>
> On the policy side: some files are not applicable to some types of
> bonds, and return a single linefeed in that case. Except for one
> single case, which returns 'NA\n'. The patch changes these cases into
> emtpy files.
>
> If these are worthy changes, I'm absolutely willing to split up the
> patch into three parts as the above.
Well that would be good if poss, thanks.
But fixing bugs is way more important than niceties of patch presentation
however I wasn't prepared to fix the rejects which that patch is hitting in
the considerably-changed bonding_show_ad_partner_mac(). Please:
- raise patches against the latest Linus tree
(ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/snapshots/)
- cc netdev@...r.kernel.org on networking-related matters
- Include a Signed-off-by: as per Documentation/SubmittingPatches
- Try to ensure that the full explanation (such as you have above) is
covered in the changelog text.
Thanks.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists