linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <25135.1196193722@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date:	Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:02:02 -0500
From:	Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Herbert Xu <herbert@...dor.apana.org.au>, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	rdreier@...co.com, ak@...e.de, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sam@...nborg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] [1/9] Core module symbol namespaces code and intro.

On Tue, 27 Nov 2007 15:12:42 +0100, Andi Kleen said:
> > OK, short of making IPv4 a module (which would be a worthy task :)
> 
> At some point there were patches, it is probably not very difficult.
> But DaveM resisted at some point because he didn't want people
> to replace the network stack (although I personally don't have a problem
> with that)

Personally, I wouldn't find replacing the ipv4 stack very interesting.

However, stress-testing your system for IPv6-readiness by doing 'rmmod ipv4' :)

(Though I admit it's something I'd *try* if it was available, but certainly
not sufficient for a reason to do it...)

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped