[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071128214502.GA3255@kroah.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 13:45:02 -0800
From: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>
To: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc: Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Kernel development list <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Randy Dunlap <randy.dunlap@...cle.com>,
Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: make sure kobj->ktype is set before
kobject_init
On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 03:42:00PM -0500, Alan Stern wrote:
> This patch (as1020) adds a check to kobject_init() to insure that the
> ktype field is not NULL. This is just for safety's sake; as far as I
> know there are no remaining places where the field is left unset. But
> ironically, kset_init() did fail to set it! The patch fixes that and
> removes some redundant initialization in kset_createa().
>
> The patch also fixes up elevator_init(), where ktype was set after
> calling kobject_init() instead of before.
No, it's safe to set ktype after kobject_init, it was just not safe to
set the kset. As Kay pointed out, I just added a patch to my tree to
resolve this issue, and I'll go back and update the documentation now.
I do like the "check for a ktype" warning, I'll go add that to my local
tree and see what breaks. Odds are, all the static kobjects will :(
thanks,
greg k-h
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists