[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200711282306.46712.rjw@sisk.pl>
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2007 23:06:45 +0100
From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: suspend-related lockdep warning
On Wednesday, 28 of November 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 (which will be released if it boots on two more machines and
> if I stay awake) will say this during suspend-to-RAM on the Vaio:
>
> [ 91.876445] Syncing filesystems ... done.
> [ 92.382595] Freezing user space processes ... WARNING: at kernel/lockdep.c:2662 check_flags()
> [ 92.384000] Pid: 1925, comm: dbus-daemon Not tainted 2.6.24-rc3-mm2 #32
> [ 92.384177] [<c0104a74>] show_trace_log_lvl+0x12/0x25
> [ 92.384335] [<c01052ff>] show_trace+0xd/0x10
> [ 92.384469] [<c01059be>] dump_stack+0x55/0x5d
> [ 92.384605] [<c0136a29>] check_flags+0x7f/0x11a
> [ 92.384746] [<c0139cfb>] lock_acquire+0x3a/0x86
> [ 92.384886] [<c031f4de>] _spin_lock+0x26/0x53
I guess this is the task_lock() in refrigerator().
If that is the case, I don't understand this trace at all.
> [ 92.385023] [<c0141d3b>] refrigerator+0x13/0xc8
> [ 92.385163] [<c01274c8>] get_signal_to_deliver+0x32/0x3fb
> [ 92.385326] [<c01030f4>] do_notify_resume+0x8c/0x699
> [ 92.385476] [<c0103c18>] work_notifysig+0x13/0x1b
> [ 92.385620] =======================
> [ 92.385719] irq event stamp: 309
> [ 92.385809] hardirqs last enabled at (309): [<c0103c79>] syscall_exit_work+0x11/0x26
> [ 92.386045] hardirqs last disabled at (308): [<c0103b42>] syscall_exit+0x14/0x25
> [ 92.386265] softirqs last enabled at (0): [<c011bea5>] copy_process+0x374/0x130e
> [ 92.386491] softirqs last disabled at (0): [<00000000>] 0x0
> [ 92.392457] (elapsed 0.00 seconds) done.
> [ 92.392581] Freezing remaining freezable tasks ... (elapsed 0.00 seconds) done.
> [ 92.392882] PM: Entering mem sleep
> [ 92.392974] Suspending console(s)
>
> this has been happening for quite some time and might even be happening in
> mainline.
>
> Also, a few seconds after resume has completed we get a whimper from the
> hangcheck driver:
>
> [ 1.762425] usb 2-1: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
> [ 1.826548] input: Microsoft Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse_ 1.00 as /class/input/input9
> [ 1.866211] input: USB HID v1.11 Mouse [Microsoft Microsoft Wireless Optical Mouse_ 1.00] on usb-0000:00:1d.1-1
> [ 5.757927] Hangcheck: hangcheck value past margin!
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists