[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <ea9232d10711300336m24cabafbk18a8b131f561348a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 12:36:49 +0100
From: "Karol Swietlicki" <magotari@...il.com>
To: Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk
Cc: loic.grenie@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C
On 30/11/2007, Ben Crowhurst <Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk> wrote:
> Loïc Grenié wrote:
> > 2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst <Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk>:
> >
> >> Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
> >>
<snip>
> > Lots of people will think of better reasons why ObjC is not used...
> >
> > Loïc Grenié
> >
> Which I'm looking forward to hear :)
>
> Thank you for your appropriate response.
Here are a few reasons off the top of my head:
1. Adding extra unneeded complexity. Debugging would be harder.
2. Not many people can code ObjC when compared to the number of C coders.
3. If it ain't broken... Why fix it. The kernel works, right? Good.
You can find a great explanation somewhere out there, I'm not sure who
wrote it and the thing was explaining why C++ is not a great choice
for the Linux kernel. Some things going against C++ will also go
against ObjC. I cannot find it, but it is out there somewhere.
I'm a newbie and I might be wrong, but the above is what I believe to be true.
Karol Swietlicki
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists