[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <474FF0FE.50208@stellatravel.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2007 11:16:14 +0000
From: Ben Crowhurst <Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk>
To: loic.grenie@...il.com
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Kernel Development & Objective-C
Loïc Grenié wrote:
> 2007/11/29, Ben Crowhurst <Ben.Crowhurst@...llatravel.co.uk>:
>
>> Has Objective-C ever been considered for kernel development?
>>
>> regards,
>> BPC
>>
>
> No, it has not. Any language that looks remotely like an OO language
> has not ever been considered for (Linux) kernel development and for
> most, if not all, other operating systems kernels.
>
> Various problems occur in an object oriented language. One of them
> is garbage collection: it provokes asynchronous delays and, during
> an interrupt or a system call for a real time task, the kernel cannot
> wait.
Objective C 1.0 does not force nor have garbage collection.
> Another is memory overhead: all the magic that OO languages
> provide take space in memory and Linux kernel is used in embedded
> systems with very tight memory requirements.
>
But are embedded systems not rapidly moving on. Turning to stare at the
ADSL X6 modem with MB's of ram.
> Lots of people will think of better reasons why ObjC is not used...
>
> Loïc Grenié
>
>
>
Which I'm looking forward to hear :)
Thank you for your appropriate response.
--
Regards
BPC
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists