linux-kernel - Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <m1wsrw1s0r.fsf@ebiederm.dsl.xmission.com>
Date:	Sun, 02 Dec 2007 18:33:24 -0700
From:	ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To:	"Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org>
Cc:	"Greg KH" <gregkh@...e.de>, "rae l" <crquan@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Since sysfs_mount is static and used only in sysfs_init function, it could be just an automatic variable.

"Kay Sievers" <kay.sievers@...y.org> writes:

> That cruft is going away with the block patch in your tree.

And it doesn't matter because it is a separate mount anyway.
Although I have to admit I hadn't taken that mount into
account earlier.

Eric

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/