[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712031658.lB3Gw7ds018649@agora.fsl.cs.sunysb.edu>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 11:58:07 -0500
From: Erez Zadok <ezk@...sunysb.edu>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
Subject: overdue items in feature-removal-schedule
Linus, Andrew, Christoph,
There are 29 listed items in feature-removal-schedule.txt. 11 of those have
dates or kernel versions that have passed, including this one:
What: remove EXPORT_SYMBOL(kernel_thread)
When: August 2006
One feature (removal of sys_sysctl) is listed for September 2010: are we
really able to predict the future with this much accuracy?
When, if at all, will those future/overdue features be removed for real?
Have any of them been removed already? It's very important to developers to
have more accurate removal schedule for planning purposes.
I think setting dates on feature removal isn't compatible with the current
model of kernel code development, b/c despite our best efforts, it's hard to
predict the precise release of the next 2.6.(x+1) kernel. I think it's
better to change all of those dates to future kernel versions (a couple of
items do so). When those dates were assigned, was there a specific kernel
version in mind?
Thanks,
Erez.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists