[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071203223353.GA20362@elte.hu>
Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2007 23:33:53 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>
Cc: Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>, davids@...master.com,
Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield
* Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
>> heh, thanks :) For which workload does it make the biggest difference
>> for you? (and compared to what other scheduler you used before?
>> 2.6.22?)
> ..
>
> Heh.. I'm just a very unsophisticated desktop user, and I like it when
> Thunderbird and Firefox are unaffected by the "make -j3" kernel builds
> that are often running in another window. BIG difference there.
>
> And on the cool side, the Swarm game (swarm.swf) is a great example of
> something that used to get jerky really fast whenever anything else
> was running, and now it really doesn't seem to be affected by
> anything. (I don't really play computer games, but this one is has a
> very retro feel..).
nice! Do you feel any difference between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc for these
workloads? (if you've tried .24 already)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists