[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <200712041118.25414.nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 11:18:24 +1100
From: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@...oo.com.au>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: Mark Lord <lkml@....ca>, Chris Friesen <cfriesen@...tel.com>,
davids@...master.com,
"Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@...ux.intel.com>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: sched_yield: delete sysctl_sched_compat_yield
On Tuesday 04 December 2007 09:33, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Mark Lord <lkml@....ca> wrote:
> >> heh, thanks :) For which workload does it make the biggest difference
> >> for you? (and compared to what other scheduler you used before?
> >> 2.6.22?)
> >
> > ..
> >
> > Heh.. I'm just a very unsophisticated desktop user, and I like it when
> > Thunderbird and Firefox are unaffected by the "make -j3" kernel builds
> > that are often running in another window. BIG difference there.
> >
> > And on the cool side, the Swarm game (swarm.swf) is a great example of
> > something that used to get jerky really fast whenever anything else
> > was running, and now it really doesn't seem to be affected by
> > anything. (I don't really play computer games, but this one is has a
> > very retro feel..).
>
> nice! Do you feel any difference between 2.6.23 and 2.6.24-rc for these
> workloads? (if you've tried .24 already)
And also, I wonder what the average timeslice and number of context
switches is between 2.6.22 and 2.6.23-4. Would be interesting to see.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists