[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1196774846.19677.3.camel@elijah.suse.cz>
Date: Tue, 04 Dec 2007 14:27:25 +0100
From: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
To: Roland McGrath <roland@...hat.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] prevent sending wrong signals to a traced process whose
tracer gets killed
Hi,
I experienced troubles when tracing a process with strace. Sometimes,
when I killed the strace process (SIGKILL), the traced process was also
killed. I found out that it was getting SIGTRAP and, indeed, when the
traced process set up a signal handler for SIGTRAP, it no longer died.
I noticed that normally, when the traced process is continued (via
PTRACE_CONT or similar), the signal to be sent to it is stored in
current->exit_code, which is then examined by the arch-specific code and
usually leads to something like:
send_sig(current->exit_code, current, 1);
The exit_code is set in ptrace_stop(), but the tracing process may go
away while the traced process waits for it, and in that case exit_code
is left as-is. I think we must set it to zero in ptrace_untrace().
Signed-off-by: Petr Tesarik <ptesarik@...e.cz>
ptrace.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff -pru a/kernel/ptrace.c b/kernel/ptrace.c
--- a/kernel/ptrace.c 2007-12-04 14:12:51.000000000 +0100
+++ b/kernel/ptrace.c 2007-12-04 14:13:28.000000000 +0100
@@ -52,6 +52,7 @@ void ptrace_untrace(struct task_struct *
{
spin_lock(&child->sighand->siglock);
if (child->state == TASK_TRACED) {
+ child->exit_code = 0;
if (child->signal->flags & SIGNAL_STOP_STOPPED) {
child->state = TASK_STOPPED;
} else {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists