linux-kernel - Re: [2.6 patch] x86: revert X86

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20071204132905.GJ31590@elte.hu>
Date:	Tue, 4 Dec 2007 14:29:05 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>
Cc:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>, mingo@...hat.com,
	hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [2.6 patch] x86: revert X86_HT semantics change


* Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org> wrote:

> The x86 unification resulted in CONFIG_X86_HT no longer being set if 
> (X86_32 && MK8).
> 
> After grep'ing through the tree I think the problem is that different
> places have different assumptions about the semantics of CONFIG_X86_HT,
> either
> - hyperthreading or
> - multicore
> 
> This should be sorted out properly, but until then we should keep the
> 2.6.23 status quo.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <bunk@...nel.org>

thanks, applied. This is for 2.6.24, right?

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/