[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071204140939.GA16328@elte.hu>
Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2007 15:09:39 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ehabkost@...hat.com,
jeremy@...p.org, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Integrate msr.h
* Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> This series of patches integrates msr.h header. What it really does,
> is a series of steps to allow us to get rid of duplicate code between
> i386 and x86_64 versions
>
> With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy, just a
> couple of extra code.
thanks, the patches look certainly sane and i've picked them up into
x86.git. A quick build & boot test was successful on both 64-bit and
32-bit, with paravirt on/off. I've pushed out the latest tree into the
'mm' branch of:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-x86.git
minor nit: some of your patches had scripts/checkpatch.pl failures,
could you try to fix them up? (If possible then as a follow-up second
patch series.) Thanks!
[ btw., how far away are you from having Kconfig selectable 64-bit
paravirt support? Just curious :-) ]
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists