lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <475576A0.5020601@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 04 Dec 2007 13:47:44 -0200
From:	Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com>
To:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	glommer@...il.com, tglx@...utronix.de, ehabkost@...hat.com,
	jeremy@...p.org, avi@...ranet.com, anthony@...emonkey.ws,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
	ak@...e.de, chrisw@...s-sol.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, hpa@...or.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/10] Integrate msr.h

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Ingo Molnar escreveu:
> * Glauber de Oliveira Costa <gcosta@...hat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Hello,
>>
>> This series of patches integrates msr.h header. What it really does, 
>> is a series of steps to allow us to get rid of duplicate code between 
>> i386 and x86_64 versions
>>
>> With this done, achieving paravirt for x86_64 gets really easy, just a 
>> couple of extra code.
> 
> thanks, the patches look certainly sane and i've picked them up into 
> x86.git. A quick build & boot test was successful on both 64-bit and 
> 32-bit, with paravirt on/off. I've pushed out the latest tree into the 
> 'mm' branch of:
> 
>    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mingo/linux-2.6-x86.git
> 
> minor nit: some of your patches had scripts/checkpatch.pl failures, 
> could you try to fix them up? (If possible then as a follow-up second 
> patch series.) Thanks!
Sure. I'll resend them.

> [ btw., how far away are you from having Kconfig selectable 64-bit
>   paravirt support? Just curious :-) ]
> 
Not too much. Jeremy is handling the page table code, and I'm basically
taking care of the rest. I don't go to far in integration in other
areas, so the patches are the same that were already previously sent
some days ago. I'll just rebase and send again.

The only rebase I'm expecting to be troublesome is the paravirt.c /
paravirt.h files. So I'd say we're close.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Remi - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFHVXagjYI8LaFUWXMRAhHjAKDVDesU/iRyDXDgQB6Pxx23PTizyQCgzzcU
rZsECAdjqaGeZqAxWY2lhro=
=qrHF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ