lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 5 Dec 2007 12:27:58 +0100
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To:	Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc:	tglx@...utronix.de, hpa@...or.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] x86_64: define all _PAGE_* in terms of _PAGE_BIT_*


* Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com> wrote:

> > > > please run patches through scripts/checkpatch.pl, it gives:
> > > > 
> > > >   total: 10 errors, 0 warnings, 42 lines checked
> > > > 
> > > > (please send a followup cleanup patch - i picked up your series and this 
> > > > is a minor cleanliness issue)
> > > 
> > > Sorry, forgot to check the patches before submission. Will cleanup and 
> > > resubmit soon.
> > 
> > please if possible send a delta against x86.git, not a replacement 
> > patch. It's easier for the patchflow.
> 
> Not sure I understand you right here. Do you mean a patch on top of my 
> previous patches?

yeah - that's easier to pick up for me (because i've already got your 
series applied), and it's also easier for you as well. It also makes 
sense to generally split style fixes from substantial patches. (in the 
cases where there are pre-existing style problems in the code)

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists