linux-kernel - Re: [REPOST PATCH] Add iSCSI IBFT support (v0.4)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 05 Dec 2007 14:26:40 -0600
From:	Doug Maxey <dwm@...yolf.org>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek <konrad@...nok.org>
cc:	darnok@....org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, pjones@...hat.com,
	konradr@...hat.com, konradr@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, greg@...ah.com,
	randy.dunlap@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com, lenb@...nel.org,
	mike.anderson@...ibm.com, dwm@...tin.ibm.com,
	Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH] Add iSCSI IBFT support (v0.4) 


On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:41:21 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> > Is the current include from open-iscsi being duplicated?  If not, why
> > not consolidate in one file?
> 
> The include files that come from open-iscsi that are in the kernel do
> not have the iBFT data structures in them - therefore no duplication.

That is strictly true, at least the "in the kernel" part.  There is a 
file with the definitions, open-iscsi utils/fwparam_ibft/fwparam_ibft.h 
does have the previous definitons.  So what to do?  Drop that one?  Or 
keep duplicating?

++doug

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/