lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 05 Dec 2007 21:36:42 +0100
From:	Peter Zijlstra <>
To:	Jie Chen <>
Cc:, Eric Dumazet <>,
	Ingo Molnar <>,
	Simon Holm Th??gersen <>
Subject: Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above

On Wed, 2007-11-21 at 15:34 -0500, Jie Chen wrote:

> It is clearly that the synchronization overhead increases as the number 
> of threads increases in the kernel 2.6.21. But the synchronization 
> overhead actually decreases as the number of threads increases in the 
> kernel (We observed the same behavior on kernel 2.6.22 as 
> well). This certainly is not a correct behavior. The kernels are 
> configuration file is in the attachment of this e-mail.
>  From what we have read, there was a new scheduler (CFS) appeared from 
> 2.6.22. We are not sure whether the above behavior is caused by the new 
> scheduler.

If I read this correctly, you say that: .22 is the first bad one right?

The new scheduler (CFS) was introduced in .23, so it seems another
change would be responsible for this.

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists