[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20071205210222.GA30089@elte.hu>
Date: Wed, 5 Dec 2007 22:02:22 +0100
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
To: Jie Chen <chen@...b.org>
Cc: Simon Holm Th??gersen <odie@...aau.dk>,
Eric Dumazet <dada1@...mosbay.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: Possible bug from kernel 2.6.22 and above, 2.6.24-rc4
* Jie Chen <chen@...b.org> wrote:
>> sorry to be dense, but could you give me instructions how i could
>> remove the affinity mask and test the "barrier overhead" myself? I
>> have built "pthread_sync" and it outputs numbers for me - which one
>> would be the barrier overhead: Reference_time_1 ?
>
> To disable affinity, do configure --enable-public-release
> --disable-thread_affinity. You should see barrier overhead like the
> following: Computing BARRIER time
>
> Sample_size Average Min Max S.D. Outliers
> 20 19.486162 19.482250 19.491400 0.002740 0
>
> BARRIER time = 19.486162 microseconds +/- 0.005371
> BARRIER overhead = 8.996257 microseconds +/- 0.006575
ok, i did that and rebuilt. I also did "make check" and got
src/pthread_sync which i can run. The only thing i'm missing, if i run
src/pthread_sync, it outputs "PARALLEL time":
PARALLEL time = 22.486103 microseconds +/- 3.944821
PARALLEL overhead = 10.638658 microseconds +/- 10.854154
not "BARRIER time". I've re-read the discussion and found no hint about
how to build and run a barrier test. Either i missed it or it's so
obvious to you that you didnt mention it :-)
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists