lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Wed, 05 Dec 2007 15:02:56 -0600
From:	Doug Maxey <>
To:	Konrad Rzeszutek <>
cc:	Mike Christie <>,,,,,,,,,,,,
	Arjan van de Ven <>
Subject: Re: [REPOST PATCH] Add iSCSI IBFT support (v0.4) 

[added cc: to mikec]

On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 16:40:46 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 02:26:40PM -0600, Doug Maxey wrote:
> > 
> > On Wed, 05 Dec 2007 13:41:21 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek wrote:
> > > > Is the current include from open-iscsi being duplicated?  If not, why
> > > > not consolidate in one file?
> > > 
> > > The include files that come from open-iscsi that are in the kernel do
> > > not have the iBFT data structures in them - therefore no duplication.
> > 
> > That is strictly true, at least the "in the kernel" part.  There is a 
> > file with the definitions, open-iscsi utils/fwparam_ibft/fwparam_ibft.h 
> > does have the previous definitons.  So what to do?  Drop that one?  Or 
> > keep duplicating?
> I would say that utils/fwparam_ibft/fwparam_ibft.h and
> utils/fwparam_ibft/fwparam_ibft.c would be dropped once this kernel
> patch and the patch to open-iscsi to add fwparam_ibft_subsys.c are
> reviewed and hopefully accepted.

Ok.  If indeed the userspace tool is going completely away, then there 
would be just the single instance.  Is that the plan?

To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
More majordomo info at
Please read the FAQ at

Powered by blists - more mailing lists